Public Procurement

Thoughts on Procurement Policy Note – Supporting Apprenticeships and Skills Through Public Procurement

Pedro Telles

Sep 10, 2015 — 1 min read

I mentioned yesterday a plan by the UK Government for introducing social considerations under the guise of supporting apprenticeships through mandatory apprenticeship programmes in some larger contracts.

The actual policy note is out (Action Note 14/15 27 August 2015) and applies to all contracts over £10M lasting for longer than 12 months and tendered by Central Government departments irrespective of their object. I was under the impression the policy would cover only works contracts, but that is not the case.

My view on social considerations is probably well known by regular readers: I am not a huge fan and remain sceptical particularly due to the lack of interest by their promoters to discuss the downsides - never a good sign.

Having said that, as far as social considerations go, this policy is reasonably sensible. It only covers large(ish) contracts and needs to be tied to the contract’s subject matter. In my view, this constitutes an improvement over similar policies which are bolted on as contract performance clauses, since at least they will have to be assessed and subject to analysis before award. Looking at the policy note the care and attention in ensuring a link to the contract’s subject matter is obvious (paragraphs 9 and 10).

The structure adopted by Central Government appears to constitute a secondary object attached to the main contract. Something akin to a mixed contract (without really being a mixed contract). Maybe a mixed contract approach would have been preferable.

Implementing this policy implies for contracting authorities even more work before the tender launch as they are now expected to “consult the market” to know what apprenticeship levels are reasonable on that type of contracts. As if most authorities did so most of the time for the mail contract object anyway...

At the end of the day however, we are still talking about more complexity and someone will end pay up for the extra apprenticeship services being delivered. There are no free lunches.

On case C-652/22 Kolin Inşaat Turizm Sanayi ve Ticaret

The CJEU laid down early this week a fairly important judgment on third country access to procurement. On case C-652/22 Kolin Inşaat Turizm Sanayi ve Ticaret the Court concluded that economic operators from third countries neither party to the GPA nor with whom the EU has a deal are

All steam ahead with the revision of the procurement Directives

A couple of weeks ago a little birdie told me the Commission wanted to get the ball rolling on the revision of the procurement legal framework within the first 100 days of its term. Well, looks like they want to hit the ground running with the evaluation of the current

The Portuguese Audit Court finds systemic abuse of direct awards

Back in 2021 the then Portuguese government decided to make procurement more flexible as to ensure the Recovery and Resilience Facility money was spent quickly. In 2023 I warned about some of the risks that the reform had introduced here and here. Fast forward to 2024 and the Portuguese Audit

The Public Procurement Data Space is upon us

The Commission launched last week the PPDS, a service that is expected to aggregate data about public procurement in the EU. In essence it takes the data included in the eForms filled in by contracting authorities and makes it available to anyone. For example, it is possible to check for

Read more

On case C-652/22 Kolin Inşaat Turizm Sanayi ve Ticaret

All steam ahead with the revision of the procurement Directives

The Portuguese Audit Court finds systemic abuse of direct awards

The Public Procurement Data Space is upon us